The Beltracchi Question:
Wolfgang Beltracchi created paintings in the style of famous artists that fooled experts for years. While replicated art such as paintings and even covers of songs may not be seen as original, I would consider them to be art. I would actually classify a lot of art as a form of imitation or at least inspired by someone or something. Because of this, I have trouble drawing a line, or having a point where imitation is no longer art.
Originality vs. Technique:
Beltracchi used his trained extraordinary artistic abilities freely, and in this case to imitate others. The question of originality vs. technique made me think of skilled tattoo artists that use photos or work by another artist as stencils, or singers that have someone write songs for them. Despite a lack of originality, I would consider both of these examples to still be art. Unique personality or technique is inevitably present in all forms of art, even imitation. Just because the naked eye or experts may not be able to distinguish small differences, it doesn’t mean they aren’t there.
The Value Paradox:
I think the fact that Beltracchi’s work only sold for millions of dollars when they were thought to be authentic shows the fact that despite whether or not one see’s imitation as art, originality is a deeply rooted human value. Despite the saying “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”, being copied or disregarded for one’s efforts is frustrating, which I see as a reason for people to value their own and others’ individuality. Along with this, I would say that people tend to look for one figure or group to idolize or give credit to for something, whether it be political ideologies, global affairs, and even smaller scale things like technological advancements and art. Because of this, I consider external factors like authorship to be more influential to many people’s appreciation of artwork.
Artistic Intent:
As I said previously, I would consider a lot of art to be a form of imitation. If using an object or being as a reference can be seen as a form of imitation, I would say that it goes the same way for artistic forgery. Despite this, traditional artists incorporate more personal interpretation when creating art, contrary to those who practice forgery. In examples like these I would say that intent has a larger impact on a possible scale of originality, not on whether or not it is really art.